As the Wisconsin Supreme Court waits to decide the fate of our basic human rights, one reader shares his thoughts with FoodFreedomUSA.org
Exclusive to FoodFreedomUSA
One is that the USA has over 238 years of being able to own our own cows and drink that milk - so this is a HUGE legal precedent which he (in his idiocy? corporate prostitution?) totally ignores. If people were not able to raise, procure, process, preserve, and consume their own foods there would be no human race. I think his assertion here is blatantly following a corporate agenda.
Which leaves us with the implications of our not having a right to drink our own milk. (Man - years later and I STILL want to kick his adze!) If we as individual citizens have no right to consume our food production then WHOSE food production can we consume? Corporate "foods". Hmmm we see where he is heading.
His ruling about production, processing, consuming and selling being forbidden to we the people shows an intent to disenfranchise the little man/woman from their food sustainability. How else can this effort be interpreted? He essentially states that individuals for whatever reason do not have the right to control our food sources or choices. By default this means that he intends us to be forced to consume ONLY corporate foods.
Now, please ignore the fact that factory foods, processed foods, GMOs, CAFOs etc are ALL proven to be about the least nutritious, most likely to contain pathogens, and most toxic foods on the market. Well, try to ignore that, lol.
Do, however look at the corporations. These are human people - usually citizens of this country, sometimes from other countries. Now if there is a theft of a citizen's rights to decide what foods they can consume - then these people who vote at shareholder meetings, board of director meetings, and management decision makers - since they are also citizens - have absolutely the same restrictions regarding food choices also. So "Judge" Fiedler is essentially stating that we, who know our own bodies better than ANYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD - and have no right to modify our diets according to our choices and necessities - have to accept the choices of citizens who will make those exact same decisions for millions of people, without biochemical modifications to account for allergies, illnesses, etc and impose THEIR WILL upon all other peoples.
Umm - can you see the absolute lack of logic inherent in the equation?